My own comments (and yes they are mine own, based on my own investigation into the pseudoscience):
A very thorough demonstration of logical fallacies at work, i.e. reification, appeal to authority, bandwagon, circular reasoning. These woman either want you confused/misled, or they somehow fail to grasp the need for valid independent and dependent variables in hypothesis testing, and that finding sequences and/or proteins doesn't tell you that they are "viral" in origin. They seem to think that condescendingly repeating the words "virus" and "viral" enough times is going to convince people. Unreal. This is on par with declaring that Santa and elves exist and were "isolated" based on men in red outfits at the mall, presents under Christmas trees and cookies crumbs on kitchen tables.
Truly astounding to hear them imply that intact so-called "viral genomes" have been found, and especially to hear them claim that "viruses" can be "isolated" directly from "hosts" when literally every single one of 222 institutions that were challenged to cite evidence of such for "SARS-COV-2" failed, and all challenges re other imaginary "viruses" also failed:
In your presentation you show around 17:45 three EM pictures of "pox family" representatives.
You then say "you see a distinct, electron-dense hourglass shape in the middle, that is the portion that contains the genomic material and the capsid."
I want more information on that.
1 Clinically, is this distinctive shape used to determine what type of viral infection an animal or a human has?
2 Is that hourglass shape present in vivo, or is it an artifact of the methods for preparing the slide?
3 What does 'electron-dense' mean in this context?
4 The classification of these viruses as being of the same "family" was done before seeing their distinctive shape through EM or after they were seen through electron microscopy?
5 What is the size of those canarypox viruses and smallpox and MVA compared to an animal cell that they are targeting?
Drs. Tom Cowan and Mark Bailey responded with their own video:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hiyHmdeYpYat/
My own comments (and yes they are mine own, based on my own investigation into the pseudoscience):
A very thorough demonstration of logical fallacies at work, i.e. reification, appeal to authority, bandwagon, circular reasoning. These woman either want you confused/misled, or they somehow fail to grasp the need for valid independent and dependent variables in hypothesis testing, and that finding sequences and/or proteins doesn't tell you that they are "viral" in origin. They seem to think that condescendingly repeating the words "virus" and "viral" enough times is going to convince people. Unreal. This is on par with declaring that Santa and elves exist and were "isolated" based on men in red outfits at the mall, presents under Christmas trees and cookies crumbs on kitchen tables.
Truly astounding to hear them imply that intact so-called "viral genomes" have been found, and especially to hear them claim that "viruses" can be "isolated" directly from "hosts" when literally every single one of 222 institutions that were challenged to cite evidence of such for "SARS-COV-2" failed, and all challenges re other imaginary "viruses" also failed:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
Hello Jennifer Smith.
I have a question about your presentation.
In your presentation you show around 17:45 three EM pictures of "pox family" representatives.
You then say "you see a distinct, electron-dense hourglass shape in the middle, that is the portion that contains the genomic material and the capsid."
I want more information on that.
1 Clinically, is this distinctive shape used to determine what type of viral infection an animal or a human has?
2 Is that hourglass shape present in vivo, or is it an artifact of the methods for preparing the slide?
3 What does 'electron-dense' mean in this context?
4 The classification of these viruses as being of the same "family" was done before seeing their distinctive shape through EM or after they were seen through electron microscopy?
5 What is the size of those canarypox viruses and smallpox and MVA compared to an animal cell that they are targeting?
Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD
The Rise Of The BioCyborg: Synthetic Biology, Artificial Chimerism And Human Enhancement
https://open.substack.com/pub/anamihalceamdphd/p/the-rise-of-the-biocyborg-synthetic?r=djekz&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web